Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
: 20 | 50 | 100
1 - 3 de 3
1.
Top Magn Reson Imaging ; 33(1): e0310, 2024 Feb 01.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38329378

BACKGROUND: Currently, there is no evidence that MRI produces harmful effects on premature newborns, as well as short-term and long-term safety issues regarding radiofrequency fields and loud acoustic environment, while the examination that is being performed has not been clearly investigated. MRI of the brain conducted on preterm infants should be part of the diagnostic workup, when necessary. This article is intended to evaluate the short-term safety of MRI performed in preterm infants, when required, by analyzing all vital parameters available before, during, and after the MRI procedures. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review of the literature on electronic medical databases (PubMed and ClinicalTrials.gov) following the Preferred Reported Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. We included all preterm infants who underwent MRI whose clinical, hemodynamic, and respiratory parameters were reported. The quality of the included articles was assessed using QUADAS-2 (Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies) tool. RESULTS: Six studies were included with a total of 311 preterm infants. No severe adverse event, such as death, occurred during MRI procedures. Vital signs remained stable in about two-thirds of all patients. CONCLUSIONS: Given the general clinical safety of MRI, we suggest it as a tool to be used in preterm infants in Neonatal Intensive Care Units, when necessary. We further suggest the development of standard protocols to guide the use of MRI in preterm infants to maximize the clinical safety of the procedure.


Infant, Premature , Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Infant, Newborn , Infant , Humans , Magnetic Resonance Imaging/adverse effects , Brain/diagnostic imaging , Radio Waves
2.
Int J Mol Sci ; 23(19)2022 Sep 24.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36232568

The aim of the study is to describe the clinical features of two unrelated patients with resistance to thyroid hormones (RTH), the first, a total thyroidectomized patient, and the second, a pregnant woman. We report the features found in her newborn who also showed RTH. Patient 1 is a 38-year-old man with total thyroidectomy managed for excessive thyroid stimulating hormone (TSH) production, which poorly responded to the replacement therapy. He was found with a THRß c.1378G>A p.(Glu460Lys) heterozygous mutation, which was also present in other members of his family (son, brother, and father). Interestingly, Patient 1 had hypertension, dyslipidemia, and hepatic steatosis, which have been recently suggested as RTH-related comorbidities. Patient 2 is a 32-year-old pregnant woman with multinodular goiter, and the THRß heterozygous variant c.959G>C, that, to the best of our knowledge, has been reported in literature only once. Her newborn had tachycardia and increased thyroid hormone levels, and showed the same mutation. After delivery, high parathyroid hormone (PTH) and calcium serum levels were found in Patient 2 and the scintigraphy showed the presence of adenoma of a parathyroid gland. This case-series study provides a practical example of the management of RTH in a thyroidectomized patient, a pregnant woman, and a newborn. A novel RTH pathogenic mutation is described for the second time in literature. Furthermore, the importance of metabolic assessment in patients with RTHß has been highlighted and the possible correlation between RTH and primary hyperparathyroidism is discussed.


Thyroid Hormone Receptors beta , Thyroid Hormone Resistance Syndrome , Adult , Calcium , Female , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Male , Mutation , Parathyroid Hormone/genetics , Pregnancy , Thyroid Hormone Receptors beta/genetics , Thyroid Hormone Resistance Syndrome/diagnosis , Thyroid Hormone Resistance Syndrome/genetics , Thyroid Hormones , Thyrotropin/genetics
3.
Expert Rev Vaccines ; 20(12): 1619-1628, 2021 12.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34592123

INTRODUCTION: The concern of undergoing vaccination during pregnancy and lactation, in absence of data on safety and efficacy in these target populations, is subject of ongoing debate nationally and internationally. However, the only real prophylactic strategy against COVID-19 is still mass vaccination, which means to vaccinate infants and pregnant and lactating women. AREAS COVERED: This is a systematic review aiming to evaluate the safety and the efficacy of COVID-19 vaccines in pregnant and lactating women and their newborns. We did advanced research on PubMed and Google Scholar, and searched for any evidence also on ClinicalTrials.gov. Results refer to a timeline going until 12 June 2021. EXPERT OPINION: Our efforts must be directed to vaccine more and more population groups which have been preliminarily excluded from the vaccination campaign. Studies have not so far highlighted plausible adverse effects in vaccinated pregnant women or in their newborns. Reactogenicity across lactating and pregnant women does not seem to differ from general population. Likewise, abortion rate does not differ from non-vaccinated pregnant women studied before the COVID-19 pandemic. It also seems that a major amount of anti-SARS-CoV-2 immunoglobulins is transferred through the placenta and the breastmilk to the newborn, providing humoral immunity.


COVID-19 Vaccines , COVID-19 , Vaccination , Antibodies, Viral , COVID-19/prevention & control , COVID-19 Vaccines/administration & dosage , Female , Humans , Immunity, Maternally-Acquired , Infant, Newborn , Lactation , Pandemics , Pregnancy
...